|
Thinking Beyond the Beltway
By Steve Towns | Editor
$14 billion in federal contracting occurs
outside of the Washington D.C. area
LYME COMPUTER SYSTEMS, A 16-PERSON FIRM
LOCATED IN NEW HAMPSHIRE, COUNTS ON FEDERAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY SALES FOR 65 PERCENT OF ITS REVENUE. Primarily using
telesales, the reseller offers traditional name-brand products --
Compaq, Toshiba, Apple and others -- at competitive prices to
government customers around the nation.
|
A closer look FAST FACTS
Spreading the Wealth
Federal buying offers opportunities for resellers, regardless of location.
GSA schedules are a key contract vehicle.
Local purchasing offices gain authority.
|
Cincinnati-based Government Acquisitions
Inc. specializes in custom-configured Gateway PCs sold through its
GSA schedule contract. The company derives three-quarters of its
annual revenue from federal government sales, and until last year
was the only reseller to hold a GSA contract for Gateway products.
McBride and Associates began aiming its
support and service offerings at the federal IT market in the 1980s,
a move born of necessity due to the lack of large corporate accounts
near its Albuquerque, N.M., headquarters. Today, the federal
government accounts for 90 percent of McBride's $180 million in
annual revenue.
What do these companies have in common? Each
takes a different approach to the market, but all rely on federal
sales for the bulk of their business. And all are based well beyond
the Washington D.C. area. Together they offer ample proof that VARs
and resellers headquartered outside of the Beltway can win their
share of federal government orders.
SIZABLE OPPORTUNITY
Eagle Eye Publishers, a Virginia-based market research firm, estimates
that prime IT contracts performed outside of Washington D.C.,
Maryland and Virginia accounted for roughly $14 billion in federal
spending during fiscal 1999. That's nearly half of the federal
government's $30 billion in total IT spending for last year.
Although the share of outside-the-beltway
spending has declined slightly over the past several years, it still
represents a significant opportunity for resellers, according to
Eagle Eye President Paul Murphy. "The trend
is flat, but the amount is substantial," he said.
According to Eagle Eye, the value of overall federal IT prime contracts grew from
$26.4 billion in fiscal 1997 to $30 billion in fiscal 1999, while
spending outside of the Washington D.C. area remained at
approximately $14 billion over the same period.
A list of the top federal IT contracting
sites compiled by the company indicates that outside-the-beltway
spending is concentrated in Texas, California, Florida, Massachusetts
and Colorado. In California alone, Eagle Eye's data shows that prime federal
IT contracts were performed at nearly 600 sites over the last three
years, at locations scattered from one end of the state to the
other.
Murphy said the
Department of Defense, Department of Energy and NASA account for
about 70 percent of total federal IT contracting dollars, regardless
of where they are spent. However defense orders may claim an even
larger slice of beyond-the-beltway business.
"I would suspect that outside of [the
Washington D.C.] area, you would see more military base spending and
large government installation spending because so much of the
Treasury, Federal Aviation Administration and Department of
Agriculture spending happens in Washington D.C., Virginia and
Maryland," he said.
Indeed, military sales represent a key focus
for resellers like Lyme Computer Systems and Government
Acquisitions.
"We work all around the country, and the
military is one of our largest pieces," said Curt Vinson, president
of Lyme Computer.
Similarly, much of Government Acquisitions'
federal business comes from military bases throughout the United
States. "Contrary to popular belief, the federal government is not
all based in the Washington D.C. area," said Dennis Obial, president
and founder of the company.
EMPOWERED BUYERS
Popularity of GSA schedule contracts and an
ongoing trend toward decentralized purchasing have combined to give
local government buyers greater leeway in deciding what to buy and
whom to buy from. These developments also may hand nearby resellers
an advantage over far-flung competitors.
"The emphasis in procurement has shifted
over the last couple of years toward selling task and delivery orders
on [GSA] schedule contracts," said Murphy, who notes that GSA schedule IT
sales grew 216 percent between fiscal 1997 and fiscal 1999.
"To the extent that local buying offices
have gained more control over buying decisions, companies need to be
there talking to them," he said.
Pat Gallagher, director of business
development for Compaq Federal, agreed that federal buyers may
prefer to purchase from local resellers. "All agencies have some
degree of latitude," he said. "There's tremendous value if you can
talk to someone who is 20 minutes away from your office, rather than
someone who's not only in a different area code, but a different
time zone."
|
A Closer Look SMALL BUSINESS ADVOCATE
HOW TO GET YOUR SHARE
The
General Services Administration's Office of Enterprise Development
(OED) helps small businesses and women- and minority-owned
firms tap into GSA's nationwide procurement opportunities.
OED runs 12 regional small business centers that provide information
about accessing GSA bidders lists, introducing new items for
government purchase and finding current bidding opportunities.
In addition, the agency sponsors events throughout the country
designed to connect small and minority-owned businesses with
government buyers. The
OED Web page, located at www.gsa.gov/oed,
offers telephone numbers and Web links for the regional business
centers, a calendar of events, and other information.
|
On the other hand, popularity of the
Internet and growth in electronic commerce also has made it easier
for smaller resellers to do business with government customers
anywhere in the world.
"It's not as difficult as it used to
be for local facilities to buy from someone who is hundreds or thousands
of miles away, particularly when they are buying well-known commodities,"
said Murphy. "When you're
talking about customized systems and the delivery of complex
services, it certainly helps to have an understanding of the local
facility and the local market. But e-commerce initiatives are
opening up local buying decisions to contractors throughout the
country."
VEHICLE OF CHOICE
Experts agree that GSA schedule contracts
hold the key to capturing many federal opportunities both inside the
Beltway and beyond, particularly for small to mid-size VARs and
resellers.
"The first thing someone's going to ask is,
'Do you have a GSA schedule?'" said Frederick Rauch, owner of
Folsom, Calif.-based Government Contract Consultants. "You need that
license to hunt first. That's the best way to get the business."
Because processing a GSA schedule contract
can take anywhere from several months to nearly a year, depending on
the complexity of the offering, resellers shouldn't wait until their
contract is approved to begin looking for buyers, said Julie Ackers,
vice president of Federal Schedules Inc., a Virginia-based GSA
contracting firm.
"You can start telling the government that
you have a proposal pending at GSA as soon as it is submitted," she
said, adding that many of the companies that come to Federal
Schedules for help in securing GSA contracts are located outside of
the Washington D.C. area.
HELP IS AVAILABLE
Ackers and others said the task of acquiring
and maintaining a GSA contract has gotten significantly easier over
the past several years, thanks largely to procurement streamlining
by the federal government. For example, she said GSA lightened the
administrative burden on contractors by extending the term of most
schedules from one year to five years.
"Before, you had to go back to GSA [for a
contract renewal] every year," said Ackers. "Now you get a five-year
contract with the option for three five-year add-ons. So you're
looking at a 20-year contract."
What's more, there is plenty of support
available for resellers interested in GSA schedule sales. Government
reseller programs run by a number of major distributors offer help
in updating and maintaining GSA contracts. And a growing number of
manufacturers -- as well as a few distributors -- offer programs
designed to open GSA schedule opportunities to resellers that don't
hold a contract.
For instance, Compaq's GSA schedule is open
to any of the manufacturer's authorized resellers, said Paul
Richards, manager of federal partners for
the Houston-based PC-maker. And GSA schedule programs from Gates/Arrow
Distributing and Comstor.net allow resellers to act as sales agents
against GSA contracts held by those distributors.
RECEPTIVE AUDIENCE
Regardless of their location or approach to
securing GSA schedule sales, Gallagher cautioned resellers against
being intimidated by the government's reputation as a demanding
client.
"The federal customer is just like any other
customer out there in the world. Yes, they have slightly more rules,
but if you sell them quality products and services they will come
back and buy from you again," he said. "They're very reasonable
people, and they have a mission to accomplish, and automation is one
of the things they need."
In fact, he said government buyers usually
are quite interested in expanding their pool of suppliers, and they
want to hear about innovative solutions to their IT requirements.
Contracting officers also may be particularly interested in talking
with small or disadvantaged businesses, given the federal
government's goals for buying from these organizations.
At least 23 percent of federal prime
contracts should be awarded to small businesses under procurement
goals established by the Office of Federal Procurement Policy
(OFPP). Within that amount, no less than 5 percent should go to
small disadvantaged businesses and at least another 5 percent should
go to women-owned businesses according to OFPP.
"[Agencies] have to do business with these
firms, and they do," Gallagher said. "Believe me, they get pinged on
if they aren't buying from small businesses."
The Big Picture
This list shows the top 75 locations in the
United States where federal government IT contracts were performed
in fiscal 1999. It also includes IT spending for fiscal 1997 and
1998 at each site.
|
CITY
|
COUNTY
|
STATE
|
FY97
|
FY98
|
FY99
|
|
Washington
|
District
Of Columbia
|
District
of Columbia
|
$1,774,252
|
$2,290,401
|
$2,869,830
|
|
Reston
|
Fairfax
|
Virginia
|
$968,078
|
$1,232,628
|
$1,275,245
|
|
Mclean
|
Fairfax
|
Virginia
|
$1,160,197
|
$1,282,148
|
$1,185,508
|
|
Fairfax
|
Fairfax
(City)
|
Virginia
|
$591,178
|
$768,517
|
$873,418
|
|
Arlington
|
Arlington
|
Virginia
|
$660,722
|
$794,614
|
$857,310
|
|
Rockville
|
Montgomery
|
Maryland
|
$674,911
|
$903,276
|
$789,405
|
|
Chantilly
|
Fairfax
|
Virginia
|
$366,400
|
$401,490
|
$600,371
|
|
Falls
Church
|
Falls
Church (City)
|
Virginia
|
$441,035
|
$463,868
|
$586,654
|
|
Melbourne
|
Brevard
|
Florida
|
$1,012,178
|
$384,757
|
$570,751
|
|
San
Diego
|
San
Diego
|
California
|
$375,961
|
$435,483
|
$544,603
|
|
Bethesda
|
Montgomery
|
Maryland
|
$388,012
|
$500,162
|
$538,880
|
|
Greenbelt
|
Prince
George's
|
Maryland
|
$604,253
|
$610,874
|
$491,291
|
|
Houston
|
Harris
|
Texas
|
$219,756
|
$208,112
|
$418,013
|
|
Herndon
|
Fairfax
|
Virginia
|
$492,015
|
$436,567
|
$408,418
|
|
Vienna
|
Fairfax
|
Virginia
|
$261,585
|
$353,717
|
$328,792
|
|
Colorado
Springs
|
El
Paso
|
Colorado
|
$210,477
|
$316,822
|
$318,723
|
|
Alexandria
|
Alexandria
(City)
|
Virginia
|
$204,806
|
$265,199
|
$308,297
|
|
Round Rock
|
Travis
|
Texas
|
$51,511
|
$187,752
|
$282,761
|
|
Taunton
|
Bristol
|
Massachusetts
|
$370,991
|
$159,370
|
$251,271
|
|
Manassas
|
Manassas
(City)
|
Virginia
|
$234,296
|
$273,693
|
$250,837
|
|
Huntsville
|
Madison
|
Alabama
|
$204,941
|
$193,754
|
$235,501
|
|
Marlborough
|
Middlesex
|
Massachusetts
|
$69,819
|
$217,171
|
$231,161
|
|
St.
Louis
|
St.
Louis (City)
|
Missouri
|
$138,295
|
$163,164
|
$229,282
|
|
Norfolk
|
Norfolk
(City)
|
Virginia
|
$57,031
|
$100,371
|
$225,998
|
|
Hanover
|
Anne
Arundel
|
Maryland
|
$145,599
|
$115,801
|
$225,494
|
|
San
Antonio
|
Bexar
|
Texas
|
$86,767
|
$144,996
|
$185,260
|
|
Fort
Belvoir
(U.S. Army)
|
Fairfax
|
Virginia
|
$35,366
|
$66,713
|
$182,756
|
|
Silver
Spring
|
Montgomery
|
Maryland
|
$226,576
|
$169,904
|
$181,772
|
|
Gaithersburg
|
Montgomery
|
Maryland
|
$270,200
|
$245,809
|
$158,019
|
|
Marshall
Space
Flight Center
|
Madison |
Alabama
|
$170,892
|
$162,841
|
$154,504
|
|
Nashua
|
Hillsborough
|
New
Hampshire
|
$109,268
|
$147,322
|
$149,297
|
|
Lanham
|
Prince
George's
|
Maryland
|
$262,669
|
$209,406
|
$148,756
|
|
Wright Patterson (Air Force)
|
Montgomery |
Ohio
|
$145,567
|
$170,563
|
$147,610
|
|
Atlanta
|
Fulton
|
Georgia
|
$138,334
|
$73,557
|
$147,528
|
|
El
Segundo
|
Los
Angeles
|
California
|
$295,404
|
$220,421
|
$144,992
|
|
Calverton
|
Montgomery
|
Maryland
|
$58,247
|
$118,545
|
$144,389
|
|
Needham
|
Norfolk
|
Massachusetts
|
$7,605
|
$51,541
|
$140,662
|
|
Dallas
|
Dallas
|
Texas
|
$170,123
|
$156,684
|
$139,559
|
|
Needham
Heights
|
Norfolk
|
Massachusetts
|
$84,666
|
$81,442
|
$135,411
|
|
Horsham
|
Montgomery
|
Pennsylvania
|
$96,617
|
$133,690
|
$130,552
|
|
Boulder
|
Boulder
|
Colorado
|
$119,464
|
$102,529
|
$129,943
|
|
Orlando
|
Orange
|
Florida
|
$95,468
|
$100,586
|
$125,697
|
|
Cedar
Rapids
|
Linn
|
Iowa
|
$109,076
|
$167,691
|
$120,954
|
|
Kansas
City
|
Jackson
|
Missouri
|
$203,654
|
$395,473
|
$119,225
|
|
Austin
|
Travis
|
Texas
|
$71,691
|
$81,942
|
$114,816
|
|
Dahlgren
|
King
George
|
Virginia
|
$86,176
|
$89,633
|
$111,146
|
|
Bedford
|
Middlesex
|
Massachusetts
|
$25,442
|
$19,864
|
$109,590
|
|
Richardson
|
Dallas
|
Texas
|
$223,594
|
$192,673
|
$109,554
|
|
Owego
|
Tioga
|
New
York
|
$180,089
|
$178,371
|
$108,625
|
|
West
Mifflin
|
Allegheny
|
Pennsylvania
|
$0
|
$0
|
$107,440
|
|
Baltimore
|
Baltimore
(City)
|
Maryland
|
$166,100
|
$173,398
|
$104,594
|
|
Greensboro
|
Guilford
|
North
Carolina
|
$40,916
|
$103,085
|
$100,811
|
|
Cape Canaveral (Air Force)
|
Brevard
|
Florida
|
$204,516
|
$198,207
|
$100,306
|
|
Fullerton
|
Orange
|
California
|
$27,266
|
$48,412
|
$96,671
|
|
Sterling
|
Loudoun
|
Virginia
|
$70,250
|
$21,263
|
$95,997
|
|
Albuquerque
|
Bernalillo
|
New
Mexico
|
$46,848
|
$79,447
|
$95,969
|
|
Fort
Monroe (U.S. Army)
|
Hampton
(City)
|
Virginia
|
$21,984
|
$29,680
|
$94,216
|
|
Saint
Petersburg
|
Pinellas
|
Florida
|
$145,362
|
$114,168
|
$92,337
|
|
New
Orleans
|
Orleans
|
Louisiana
|
$30,815
|
$58,285
|
$91,750
|
|
Ballston
|
Arlington
|
Virginia
|
$21,430
|
$113,908
|
$89,537
|
|
Columbia
|
Howard
|
Maryland
|
$102,099
|
$99,075
|
$88,791
|
|
Springfield
|
Fairfax
|
Virginia
|
$54,613
|
$51,486
|
$88,726
|
|
Wayland
|
Middlesex
|
Massachusetts
|
-$4,371
|
$115,829
|
$88,116
|
|
Indianapolis
|
Marion
|
Indiana
|
$58,000
|
$29,877
|
$87,593
|
|
Fort
Wayne
|
Allen
|
Indiana
|
$360,850
|
$286,098
|
$82,938
|
|
Annapolis
|
Anne
Arundel
|
Maryland
|
$38,555
|
$45,520
|
$80,450
|
|
Lake
Ridge
|
Prince
William
|
Virginia
|
$9,409
|
$5,671
|
$79,934
|
|
Montgomery
|
Montgomery
|
Alabama
|
$87,937
|
$74,021
|
$78,091
|
|
Virginia
Beach
|
Virginia
Beach (City)
|
Virginia
|
$57,823
|
$63,779
|
$76,977
|
|
Hampton
|
Hampton
(City)
|
Virginia
|
$60,240
|
$65,403
|
$74,675
|
|
Denver
|
Denver
|
Colorado
|
$84,248
|
$93,605
|
$74,606
|
|
Durham
|
Durham
|
North
Carolina
|
$21,981
|
$62,951
|
$72,900
|
|
Scottsdale
|
Maricopa
|
Arizona
|
$126,399
|
$87,857
|
$72,289
|
|
North
Sioux City
|
Union
|
South
Dakota
|
$58,561
|
$53,014
|
$70,933
|
|
Sunnyvale
|
Santa
Clara
|
California
|
$137,886
|
$61,230
|
$70,784
|
Source: This list, as well as other
data in the accompanying article, was provided by Eagle Eye Publishers
Inc., a Virginia-based company that tracks federal contract and
grant information. More information is online at www.eagleeyeinc.com.
STEVE TOWNS IS
EDITOR OF GOVERNMENT TECHNOLOGY RESELLER. |